Constructed language

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(Redirected from A posteriori language)
Jump to: navigation, search
 Constructed languages Portal

A constructed or artificial language — known colloquially or informally as a conlang — is a language whose phonology, grammar, and/or vocabulary have been devised by an individual or group, instead of having evolved naturally. There are many possible reasons to create a constructed language: to ease human communication (see international auxiliary language and code); to bring fiction or an associated constructed world to life; linguistic experimentation; celebration of one's aesthetic tastes in language; and language games.

The synonym planned language is sometimes used to refer to international auxiliary languages, and by individuals who may disagree with the more common term "artificial". For example, few speakers of Interlingua consider their language artificial, since it has no invented content. While this is not true of Esperanto and Ido, some speakers of these languages also avoid the term "artificial language" because they deny that there is anything "unnatural" about the use of their language in human communication.

Calling languages "planned" also addresses a difficulty with the term "constructed language": a few languages are loosely grouped under this heading as a result of shared history and uses but are not themselves viewed as constructed. Interlingua has a naturally occurring vocabulary and grammar that have been catalogued and standardized by a linguistic research body. While standardization might be considered planning of a sort, it is difficult to characterize as constructed a language whose content has developed naturally.

Similarly, Latino sine Flexione (LsF) is a simplification of Latin from which the inflections have been removed. As with Interlingua, it is difficult to explain how LsF might be viewed as constructed. Both LsF and Interlingua are considered major auxiliary languages, although only Interlingua is widely spoken today.

Outside the Esperanto community, the term language planning refers to prescriptive measures taken regarding a natural language. In this regard, even "natural languages" may be artificial in some respects. In the case of prescriptive grammars, where wholly artificial rules exist, the line is difficult to draw. For example, the rule in the English language that prohibits a split infinitive is artificial. "Glossopoeia," coined by J. R. R. Tolkien, is also used to refer to language construction.

Contents

Constructed languages are often divided into a priori languages, in which much of the grammar and vocabulary is created from scratch (using the author's imagination or automatic computational means), and a posteriori languages, where the grammar and vocabulary are derived from one or more natural languages.

In turn, a posteriori languages are divided into schematic languages, in which a natural or partly natural vocabulary is altered to fit pre-established rules, and naturalistic languages, in which a natural vocabulary retains its normal sound and appearance. While Esperanto is generally considered schematic, Interlingua is viewed as naturalistic. Ido is presented variously as a schematic language or as a compromise between the two types.

Fictional and experimental languages can also be naturalistic in the sense that they are meant to sound natural and, if derived a posteriori, they try to follow natural rules of phonological, lexical and grammatical change. In contrast with Interlingua, these languages are not usually intended for easy learning or communication. Thus, a naturalistic fictional language tends to be more difficult and complex, not less. While Interlingua has a simple grammar, syntax, and orthography, some naturalistic fictional languages try to mimic such behaviours of natural languages as irregular verbs and nouns, complicated phonological rules, and the like.

In terms of purpose, most constructed languages can broadly be divided as:

  • Engineered languages (engelangs /ˈendʒlæŋz/), further subdivided into philosophical languages, logical languages (loglangs) and experimental languages; devised for the purpose of experimentation in logic, philosophy or linguistics
  • Auxiliary languages (auxlangs) — devised for international communication (also IALs, for International Auxiliary Language)
  • Artistic languages (artlangs) — devised to create aesthetic pleasure or humorous effect

But the boundaries between these categories are by no means clear, and a language devised for more than one purpose could easily fall into more than one, or even all, of the above categories. A logical language created for aesthetic reasons would also be classifiable as an artistic language, which might be created by someone with philosophical motives intending for said conlang to be used as an auxiliary language. There are no rules, either inherent in the process of language construction or externally imposed, that would limit a constructed language to fitting only one of the above categories.

A constructed language can have native speakers if children learn it at an early age from parents who have learned the language. Esperanto is said to have a considerable number of native speakers, variously placed between 200 and 2000 by advocates of the language as a communication medium. Interlingua and Ido have native speakers as well, although their numbers are currently unknown. A member of the Klingon Language Institute, d'Armond Speers, attempted to raise his son as a native (bilingual with English) Klingon speaker.[1] Evan Robertson, the creator of Mosro [1], successfully taught the language to his four youngest children.

But as soon as a constructed language has a number of native speakers, it begins to evolve, and so loses its constructed status over time. For example Modern Hebrew was modeled on Biblical Hebrew rather than engineered from scratch, and has undergone considerable changes since the state of Israel was founded in 1948 (Hetzron 1990:693).

Proponents of particular constructed languages often have many reasons for using them. Among these, the famous but disputed Sapir-Whorf hypothesis is sometimes cited; this claims that the language one speaks influences the way in which one thinks. Thus, a "better" language should allow the speaker to reach some elevated level of intelligence, or to encompass more diverse points of view. A constructed language could also by this hypothesis be used to restrict thought, as in George Orwell's Newspeak, or to simplify thought, as in Toki Pona. In contrast, some linguists such as Stephen Pinker argue that ideas exist in the mind in a language-independent format, such that children spontaneously re-invent slang and even grammar with each generation. (See The Language Instinct.) If this argument is true, any attempt to control the range of human thought solely through the reform of language would be doomed to failure, as concepts like "freedom" will reappear in new words if the old ones vanish.

Some proponents may claim a particular language makes it easier to express and understand concepts in one area, and also makes it more difficult to express and understand ideas in other areas (the various computer languages may be seen as this kind of constructed language).

Another reason some cite for using a constructed language is the telescope rule; this claims that it takes less time to first learn a simple constructed language and then learn a natural language, than to learn only that natural language. Thus, if someone wants to learn English, some[citation needed] suggest learning Basic English first; if someone wants to learn some other European language, some[citation needed] suggest learning Esperanto first.

The ISO 639-2 standard reserves the language code "art" to denote artificial languages. However, some constructed languages have their own ISO 639 language codes (e.g. "eo" and "epo" for Esperanto, or "ia" and "ina" for Interlingua and "qny" for Quenya).

In the CONLANG Mailing List, a community of conlangers has developed, which has its own customs, such as translation relays (Higley 2000).

Grammatical speculation is documented from Classical Antiquity, with Plato's Cratylus. However the suggested mechanisms of grammar were designed to explain existing languages (Latin, Greek, Sanskrit), rather than constructing new grammars. Roughly contemporary to Plato, in his descriptive grammar of Sanskrit, Pāṇini constructed a set of rules for explaining language, so that the text of his grammar may be considered a mixture of natural and constructed language.

The earliest non-natural languages were not so much considered "constructed" as "super-natural" or mystical. The Lingua Ignota, recorded in the 12th century by St. Hildegard of Bingen is an example of this; apparently it is a form of private mystical cant (see also language of angels). An important example from the Middle-Eastern culture is the Balaibalan, invented in the 16th century. Kabbalistic grammatical speculation was directed at recovering the original language spoken by Adam and Eve in Paradise, lost in the confusion of tongues. The first Christian project for an ideal language is outlined in Dante Alighieri's De vulgari eloquentia, where he searches for the ideal Italian vernacular suited for literature. Ramon Llull's Ars magna was a project of a perfect language with which the infidels could be convinced of the truth of the Christian faith. It was basically an application of combinatorics on a given set of concepts. During the Renaissance, Lullian and Kabbalistic ideas were extensively drawn upon in a magical context, resulting in cryptographic applications. The Voynich manuscript may be an example of this.

Renaissance interest in Ancient Egypt, notably the discovery of the Hieroglyphica of Horapollo, and first encounters with the Chinese script directed efforts towards a perfect language of written characters. Johannes Trithemius, in his works Steganographia and Polygraphia, attempted to show how all languages can be reduced to one. In the 17th century, interest in magical languages was continued by the Rosicrucians and Alchemists (like John Dee). Jakob Boehme in 1623 spoke of a "natural language" (Natursprache) of the senses.

Musical languages from the Renaissance were tied up with mysticism, magic and alchemy, sometimes also referred to as the language of the birds. The Solresol project of 1817 re-invented the concept in a more pragmatic context.

The 17th century also saw the rise of projects for "philosophical" or "a priori" languages. It was pioneered by Francis Lodwick's A Common Writing (1647) and The Groundwork or Foundation laid (or So Intended) for the Framing of a New Perfect Language and a Universal Common Writing (1652), Sir Thomas Urquhart (Logopandecteision, 1652) George Dalgarno (Ars signorum, 1661) and John Wilkins (Essay towards a Real Character, and a Philosophical Language, 1668) producing systems of hierarchical classification that were intended to result in both spoken and written expression. Gottfried Leibniz with lingua generalis in 1678 pursued a similar end, aiming at a lexicon of characters upon which the user might perform calculations that would yield true propositions automatically, as a side-effect developing binary calculus. These projects were not only occupied with reducing or modelling grammar, but also with the arrangement of all human knowledge into "characters" or hierarchies, an idea that with the Enlightenment would ultimately lead to the Encyclopédie.

Leibniz and the encyclopedists realized that it is impossible to organize human knowledge unequivocally in a tree diagram, and consequently to construct an a priori language based on such a classification of concepts. Under the entry Charactère, D'Alembert critically reviewed the projects of philosophical languages of the preceding century. After the Encyclopédie, projects for a priori languages moved more and more to the lunatic fringe. Individual authors, typically unaware of the history of the idea, continued to propose taxonomic philosophical languages until the early 20th century (e.g. Ro), but most recent engineered languages have had more modest goals; some are limited to a specific field, like mathematical formalism or calculus (e.g. Lincos and programming languages), others are designed for eliminating syntactical ambiguity (e.g., Loglan and Lojban) or maximizing conciseness (e.g., Ithkuil, Ygyde).

Already in the Encyclopédie attention began to focus on a posteriori auxiliary languages. Joachim Faiguet in the article on Langue already wrote a short proposition of a "laconic" or regularized grammar of French. During the 19th century, a bewildering variety of such International Auxiliary Languages (IALs) were proposed, so that Louis Couturat and Leopold Leau in Histoire de la langue universelle (1903) reviewed 38 projects.

The first of these that made any international impact was Volapük, proposed in 1879 by Johann Martin Schleyer; within a decade, 283 Volapükist clubs were counted all over the globe. However, this language by its very success lost its unity, and within a few years, fell into obscurity, making way for Esperanto, proposed in 1887 by Ludwik Lejzer Zamenhof. Ido, made public in 1907, was a reform of Esperanto. Finally, Interlingua emerged in 1951, when the International Auxiliary Language Association published its Interlingua-English Dictionary and an accompanying grammar.

Loglan (1955) and its descendants constitute a pragmatic return to the aims of the a priori languages, tempered by the requirement of usability of an auxiliary language. Thus far, these modern a priori languages have garnered only small groups of speakers.

Artistic languages, constructed for literary enjoyment or aesthetic reasons without any claim of usefulness, begin to appear in Early Modern literature (in Pantagruel, and in Utopian contexts), but they only seem to gain notability as serious projects from the 20th century. A Princess of Mars by Edgar Rice Burroughs was possibly the first fiction of the 20th century to feature a constructed language. Tolkien was the first to develop a family of related fictional languages and was the first academic to publicly discuss artistic languages, admitting to A Secret Vice of his in 1930 at an Esperanto congress. (Orwell's Newspeak should be considered a parody of an IAL rather than an artistic language proper.)

By the turn of the 21st century, it had become common for science-fiction and fantasy works set in other worlds to feature constructed languages, or more commonly, an extremely limited but defined vocabulary which suggests the existence of a complete language, and constructed languages are a regular part of the genre, including Star Wars, Star Trek, Stargate SG-1, Atlantis: The Lost Empire, or the Myst series of computer adventure games. The most famous of these examples is the Klingon language from Star Trek, which has a bona-fide vocabulary and a full set of functional grammar rules.

While most constructed languages have been created by a single person, a few are the results of group collaborations; examples are Interlingua, which was developed by the International Auxiliary Language Association, and Lojban, which was developed by a breakaway group of Loglanists.

Group collaboration has apparently become more common in recent years, as constructed language designers have started using Internet tools to coordinate design efforts. NGL/Tokcir [2] was an early Internet collaborative engineered language whose designers used a mailing list to discuss and vote on grammatical and lexical design issues. More recently, The Demos IAL Project is developing an international auxiliary language with similar collaborative methods.

Several artistic languages were developed on different constructed language wikis, usually involving discussion and voting on phonology, grammatical rules and so forth. An interesting variation is the corpus approach, exemplified by Madjal and more recently Kalusa, where contributors simply read the corpus of existing sentences and add their own sentences, perhaps reinforcing existing trends or adding new words and structures. The Kalusa engine adds the ability for visitors to rate sentences as acceptable or unacceptable. There is no explicit statement of grammatical rules or explicit definition of words in this corpus approach; the meaning of words is inferred from their use in various sentences of the corpus, perhaps in different ways by different readers and contributors, and the grammatical rules can be inferred from the structures of the sentences that have been rated highest by the contributors and other visitors.

A special example for this kind of language is Simplish[3]: the German Artist Ulli Purwin tried to set a focus on that what Germans call 'Anglizismen' - in a humorous way. Everyone is invited to increase the vocabulary: from 'ââtist' to 'ørn'...

  • Eco, Umberto (1995). The search for the perfect language. Oxford: Blackwell. ISBN 0631174656
  • Hetrzon, Robert (1990). "Hebrew". In Bernard Comrie (ed.), The World's Major Languages. New York: Oxford UP. ISBN 0-19-506511-5
  • Libert, Alan (2000). A Priori Artificial Languages. Munich: Lincom Europa. ISBN 3-89586-667-9
  1. ^ Gavin Edwards: Babble On Revisited, Wired Magazine, Issue 7.08, August 1999

Wikibooks
Wikibooks has a book on the topic of
Scholarship
Communities
How to


Directories


Wikis
v • d • e
Constructed languages (conlangs)
WikiPortal • WikiProject
Conlang types Artificial script • Artistic language (artlang) • Constructed language (conlang) • Engineered language (engelang) • Euroclone • Fictional language • International auxiliary language (IAL) • Language game • Logical language (loglang) • Musical language • Relexification • Universal language • Whistled language
Most notable
conlangs		 Blissymbols • Elvish languages • Enochian • Esperanto • Ido • Ithkuil • Klingon • Láadan • Lingua Ignota • Loglan • Lojban • Nadsat • Newspeak • Solresol • Teonaht • Toki Pona • Verdurian • Volapük
Resources CONLANG • Conlanger • Conlang XSAMPA • Ill Bethisad • Langmaker • Language Creation Conference • Language Construction Kit • Translation relay • Zompist.com • List of constructed languages

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructed_language"
Advanced Search
Included Web Search Engines


Safe Search

close

Top Matching Results

Occasionally Search.com will highlight specialized results that are based on the context of your query. Examples of specialized results include specific links to news, images, or video.

Top Matching Results may highlight information from other Search.com pages, content from the CNET Network of sites, or third party content. The listings are based purely on relevance. Search.com does not receive payment for listings in this section but our partners that provide this data may get paid for listing these products.

Sponsored Links

This section contains paid listings which have been purchased by companies that want to have their sites appear for specific search terms and related content. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by a third party and are not endorsed by Search.com.

Search Results

Search.com sends your search query to several search engines at one time and integrates the results into one list which has been sorted by relevance using Search.com's proprietary algorithm. You can customize the list of search engines included in your metasearch from the preferences.

The search engines that are used in your metasearch may allow companies to pay to have their Web sites included within the results. To view the Paid Inclusion policy for a specific search engine, please visit their Web site. Search.com does not accept payment or share revenue with any search engine partner for listings in this section.