Trade and Commerce

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In Canadian constitutional law, section 91(2) of the Constitution Act, 1867 provides the federal government with the authority to legislate on matters related to the regulation of Trade and Commerce. This power is generally balanced against the provincial power over property and civil rights under section 92(13) as well as "matters of a local nature" under section 92(16).

The trade and commerce clause was first examined in Citizen's Insurance Co. v. Parsons (1881). The Privy Council identified two branches of the clause. A matter could fall under the inter-provincial branch if it concerned "international and interprovincial trade", or in the alternative, it could fall under the general trade branch if it concerned the "general regulation of trade affecting the Dominion as a whole".

Contents

Initially the scope for inter-provincial trade was set very narrowly by the Privy Council. In the Board of Commerce case, the Privy Council suggested that the trade and commerce power only applied as an ancillary power to some other valid federal power. This principle was eventually rejected in Toronto Electric Commissioners v. Snider, but the power was still read strictly. In R. v. Eastern Terminal Elevator Co. (1925), a federal law regulating trade of provincially produced grain destined entirely for export was found not to be within the meaning of inter-provincial trade. Similar marketing schemes were held to be invalid on the same basis [1]

Many federal laws were struck down on the basis that it regulated transactions that took place solely within the province. [2]

With the abolishment of appeals to the Privy Council the interpretation of the power became broader. In Caloil Inc. v. Canada (1971) the Court upheld a law prohibiting the movement of imported oil as a form of regulating inter-provincial trade.

The most significant decision was the Reference re Agricultural Products Marketing Act (1978) where the Supreme Court upheld a federal egg marketing scheme that imposed quotas of different provinces. This was a particularly broad interpretation of inter-provincial trade as it included even egg producers who did not export their products.

The Court has also considered the effect of provincial law on the trade and commerce power. In Carnation Co. v. Quebec Agricultural Marketing Board, the Court held that provincial regulations that had an incidental effect on inter-provincial trade was valid. However, if the provincial scheme limits the free flow of trade between provinces than it will be struck down. [3]

The general trade branch was considered in General Motors of Canada Ltd. v. City National Leasing. The Court listed five indicia of a valid law under the general trade branch. In this case it was found that the inquiry must consider whether the law was part of a regulatory scheme, whether there was an agency to oversee the scheme, whether the matter concerned trade as a whole, whether the provinces could have been incapable of enacting such a scheme, and whether the failure of a province to participate would jeopardize the scheme.

The regulation of general trade must be broad and sweeping, and cannot single out a particular trade or industry. In Labatt Breweries v. Canada (1979), the Court held that the regulation of the composition of "light beer" under the Food and Drugs Act was invalid as it was too narrow to be directed towards trade.

The federal Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act was upheld under the general trade branch of the trade and commerce power. Consequently, the Act is applicable to all commercial enterprises, including provincially incorporated companies.

  1. ^ Natural Products Marketing Reference (1937).
  2. ^ Home Oil Distributors Ltd v. Attorney General of British Columbia (1940)
  3. ^ AG Manitoba v. Manitoba Egg and Poultry Association (1971)


Constitution Act, 1867
Division of powers | Peace, order and good government | Criminal law power | Trade and Commerce clause | Works and Undertakings | Property and civil rights | Disallowance and reservation

Canada Act 1982
Constitution Act, 1982
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms | Aboriginal Rights clause | Amending formula

List of Canadian constitutional documents

History of the Constitution
Royal Proclamation of 1763 | Quebec Act | Constitutional Act of 1791 | Act of Union 1840 | British North America Acts | Statute of Westminster 1931
Constitutional debate
Fulton-Favreau formula | Victoria Charter | Meech Lake Accord | Charlottetown Accord | Calgary Declaration | Other unsuccessful amendments
Interpretation of the Constitution
Pith and substance | Double aspect | Paramountcy | Living tree | Implied Bill of Rights | Dialogue principle | Interjurisdictional immunity
Advanced Search
Included Web Search Engines


Safe Search

close

Top Matching Results

Occasionally Search.com will highlight specialized results that are based on the context of your query. Examples of specialized results include specific links to news, images, or video.

Top Matching Results may highlight information from other Search.com pages, content from the CNET Network of sites, or third party content. The listings are based purely on relevance. Search.com does not receive payment for listings in this section but our partners that provide this data may get paid for listing these products.

Sponsored Links

This section contains paid listings which have been purchased by companies that want to have their sites appear for specific search terms and related content. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by a third party and are not endorsed by Search.com.

Search Results

Search.com sends your search query to several search engines at one time and integrates the results into one list which has been sorted by relevance using Search.com's proprietary algorithm. You can customize the list of search engines included in your metasearch from the preferences.

The search engines that are used in your metasearch may allow companies to pay to have their Web sites included within the results. To view the Paid Inclusion policy for a specific search engine, please visit their Web site. Search.com does not accept payment or share revenue with any search engine partner for listings in this section.